New Lawsuit Challenges Sacramento County’s Coyote Creek Decision

December 19, 2025

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Liv O’Keeffe, California Native Plant Society/ lokeeffe[at]cnps[dot]org / 916-738-7602, ext. 202

December 19, 2025, Sacramento — Today, the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) and the Environmental Council of Sacramento (ECOS) filed suit against the County of Sacramento for its recent approval of the Coyote Creek Agrivoltaic Ranch Project. The organizations cited numerous deficiencies in the project’s Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), and warned county officials ahead of the Nov. 18 Sacramento County Board of Supervisors vote that the report “is so deeply flawed that it is insufficient to support informed decision-making.”

The project site comprises 2,704 acres of the historic Barton Ranch, a property characterized by rolling hills, oak woodlands, grasslands, vernal pools, and seasonal wetlands. Plans include a solar development area covering 1,412 acres, which would require permanent changes to the landscape, including the blasting and excavation of 1,461,000 cubic yards of earth and rock. The industrial-level repurposing of the land would result in the loss of 3,493 trees, many of which are mature blue oaks and heritage trees. The largest oak proposed for removal has a chest-height diameter of 67 inches and is estimated to be approximately 850 years old.

“We’re talking about trees dating back to the time of Ghengis Khan and the Middle Ages—destroyed without appropriate due diligence and in conflict with the county’s own plans,” said CNPS Conservation Program Director Nick Jensen, referencing the multiple ways the project is out of compliance with the Sacramento County General Plan. Points of potential conflict include county plan elements concerning the placement of energy production and large-scale renewable energy facilities and replanting requirements for mitigation.

“But make no mistake, this is not a choice between clean energy or irreplaceable habitat,” said ECOS Policy Analyst Luz Lim. “We all want and need appropriately planned clean energy for our county, but thanks to other projects underway, SMUD is already on track to fulfill its 2030 Zero Net Carbon Plan. Instead, and ironically, we’re potentially destroying thousands of oaks, which are one of nature’s most powerful tools to trap and sequester carbon.”

A single oak can sequester vast amounts of carbon each year and support as many as 300 different types of wildlife, making these native trees a “nature-based solution” to the impacts of climate change. Some ecologists also use the term “keystone species” to describe oaks, because of their disproportionately large impact on ecosystems.

In just one example of the FEIR’s deficiencies, the plan accounts for a 1:1 replacement of oak saplings for each mature oak removed. In contrast, the Sacramento County General Plan calls for one tree seedling for each inch of trunk diameter removed—a total 79,126.40 inches, according to the Arborist’s report for the project. In a November Sacramento Bee article, U.C. Berkeley integrative biology professor Todd Dawson, said the mitigation is “severely misaligned with the timescale to reestablish ‘mature’ trees and the woodlands they would compose,” and explained that blue oak acorns are hard to grow successfully, and that young trees often die from heat, drought or being eaten by wildlife.

The project also represents potential and significant ecological impacts to two perennial streams feeding into Deer Creek and ultimately the Cosumnes River; multiple sensitive or endangered species, such as tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor), burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia hypugaea), and American badger (Taxidea taxus); and 25% of the entire known occurrences of the rare western spiked rosinweed (Calycadenia spicata).

Concern over the Coyote Creek project has generated an outpouring of local activism. Hundreds of people showed up for the November Board of Supervisors vote to provide testimony. More than 150 people spoke at the meeting, and more than 900 provided written comments, with 95% opposed to the project.

And it’s no wonder, said Carol Witham, an ecologist and representative of the local CNPS Sacramento Valley Chapter. “Destroying high quality intact habitat that is home to some of the highest biodiversity and highest capacity for carbon sequestration in the county is unacceptable and sets a dangerous precedent for future development. One of the largest threats to biodiversity is climate change, the approval of projects like this makes efforts to reduce this threat a threat of its own.” 

#

California Native Plant Society is a statewide nonprofit organization that protects California’s native plants and their natural habitats through science, education, stewardship, gardening, and advocacy. CNPS has more than 13,000 members and 35 chapters supporting its mission throughout California and Baja California, Mexico. Learn more at cnps.org.

The Environmental Council of Sacramento (ECOS) is coalition of Sacramento area environmental organizations that work to protect the lands, waters, wildlife and native plants in the Sacramento region to drive conversation and action for good planning. Learn more at www.ecosacramento.net.

Image: Blue oak (Quercus douglasii) woodlands in Coyote Creek (courtesy of CNPS)

SMUD’s controversial Coyote Creek solar project moves forward, November 11, 2025, Capradio

By Manola Secaira | Capradio | November 19, 2025

The Sacramento County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the Sacramento Municipal Utility District’s (SMUD’s) controversial Coyote Creek solar project at a packed Tuesday meeting.

Over 150 people showed up to share concerns or support over the course of hours. The solar project involves developing over a thousand acres in southeastern Sacramento County. The site lies near Rancho Murrieta and the Prairie City State Vehicle Recreation Area.

Luz Lim, a policy analyst for the nonprofit Environmental Council of Sacramento, also spoke against the project.

“We think it is necessary to have solar development to reach our climate goals, but we also need to be strategic,” Lim said. “It doesn’t make sense that we are going to, in the name of green energy, kill thousands of blue oak trees, native trees, that have been here for a really long time.”

Click here to read the article in full.

Help save Blue Oak woodland in Sacramento County 10/6/2025

October 6, 2025

Please share with your networks!

Please join us at the upcoming October 6th, 2025 Sacramento County Planning Commission meeting to tell them that you oppose destroying thousands of oak trees, native wetlands, native grasslands and numerous local and rare species.

The Sacramento County Planning Commission will be deciding on October 6th, 2025 whether to recommend to the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors the approval of an approximately 1200 acre industrial solar facility in the eastern part of Sacramento County. Whereas we 100% support renewable resources, this is an unacceptable location to site such a facility because:

  • It will kill more than 3000 native oak trees
  • It will destroy habitat for numerous local and protected species
  • It will disrupt an important wildlife corridor at a time where such corridors are increasingly important because of climate change and the growing need for species to seek colder climes.
  • They are many far more appropriate sites in the county.
  • SMUD does not need this project to be able to close local fossil fuel plants or meet its 2030 net zero carbon goals
  • It disrupts the ability of the South Sacramento Habitat Conservation plan to achieve its conservation goals.
  • It runs counter to Sacramento County general plan directives for the use of this area.
  • It will destroy sacred ground and associated cultural resources for local tribes.
  • It will be a visual blight in a very scenic part of the county.
  • It will negatively impact operations and events in the state vehicular recreation area, immediately adjacent to the proposed facility. These events generate 57 million dollars for the local economy and that revenue would be at risk with the degradation of a massive industrial solar facility being installed immediately adjacent to their facility.

It is extremely important for the planning commission meeting to be packed so the commissioners will know the level of opposition to this project.

The meeting will be held at 700 H street, Suite 1450, Sacramento, CA at 5:30 pm.

Public comment is not necessary if that makes you uncomfortable. We need to fill that chamber!!!

Fighting for Land: We need more housing, but we also want to protect wildland, September 23, 2023, Comstock’s Magazine

By Brad Branan | September 23, 2024 | Comstock’s Magazine

The Swainson’s hawk is considered threatened in California, the result of lost habitat. Yet it is doing well in the Natomas Basin, in part because of a conservation plan that sets aside land for habitat, like the farm where the hawk foraged.

That could change due to four major development projects that are planned in the Natomas Basin. The projects would replace important wildland with homes, warehouses and other buildings.

Click here to read the full article.

Upper Westside Plan headed for Sac County supes vote in spring 2025, September 13, 2024, The Sacramento Business Journal

By Ben van der Meer | September 13, 2024 | The Sacramento Business Journal

The Upper Westside Plan for Natomas is facing “…opposition from smart-growth advocates. The Environmental Council of Sacramento, in opposing another Natomas development project called Airport South, said they worried approval of that project and its changes to the urban services boundary would open the door to even bigger projects like the Upper Westside Plan.”

Click here to read the article in full.