CANCELLED – Vote on Upper Westside

CANCELLED – Vote on Upper Westside

The Board of Supervisors will not vote on the Upper Westside Project at 2 pm on April 28, 2026.

The vote on Upper Westside has been cancelled due to the absence of one of the Supervisors.  Staff is recommending that the Board of Supervisors drop the item from the April 28 agenda and reschedule it to a date when all five Supervisors are in attendance.

The vote has not been rescheduled yet and the Agenda may not have been modified yet (3:45 pm April 27, 2026).

Upper Westside – Help Us Oppose!

Vote is Confirmed!

The Board of Supervisors has scheduled their vote on the Upper Westside Project for Tuesday, April 28 at 2 pm.  The agenda and the staff report are here, they were published April 22, 2026 well after 6 pm.

The Supervisors will meet in Board Chambers at 700 H Street, Sacramento.  The vote will be on the EIR and the Project. 

Take Action

  1. Send a Comment to BoardClerk[at]saccounty[dot]gov
    The vote is Agenda item # 66 “The Upper Westside Specific Plan”.  Put this information at the top of your comment.
  2. Attend the meeting.  You can make a two minute verbal comment. For written or verbal comment ideas, see Comment Ideas, below
  3. Sign our Upper Westside Petition
  4. Contribute. Your donation helps us oppose this project
  5. Share this information and ask others to join our mailing list.
  6. Share this Video of people who live on Garden Hwy speaking out against the project.
  7. We will be at Sacramento Earth Day at Southside Park on Sunday April 26 from 11-4.  Stop by our booth #R2, and say hi!

Background

The County Board of Supervisors has scheduled the vote to approve or deny this project which will rezone over 2,000 acres of farmland to enable residential and commercial development, thus destroying the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan.

The fundamental reason to oppose this project is that the County should not build an unincorporated city, the size of Galt, on land next to the Sacramento River. It will destroy valuable farmland and wildlife habitat, and, without improving main transportation arteries, increase traffic and congestion by adding over 20,000 people to Natomas. This project also flouts long-standing agreements between the City and the County. The City and the Natomas Basin Conservancy have retained counsel and sent strongly worded letters to the County explaining how proposed rezoning will destroy the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan. You should help us to oppose this project.

Comment Ideas

Email a comment to BoardClerk[at]saccounty[dot]gov. Include “Upper Westside Specific Plan” in the subject. Providing your contact information is optional. Or, you can mail a comment to the County Board of Supervisors at 700 H Street, Suite 2450, Sacramento, CA 95814

Points for your comments could include the following. You don’t need to use them all – use ones that reflect your reasons for opposition.

  • The City’s opposition – The City Council passed a resolution against UWSP.  The City’s excellent letter is here.
  • There will be irreversible and fatal impacts to the Natomas Basin Conservancy, the Swainson’s Hawk and the Swainson’s Hawk Zone.  Two excellent letters from NBC are here.
  • Traffic impacts to I-5 and I-80, West El Camino, and Garden Highway.
  • There is no viable source of water. The urban water rights do not exist for these parcels and water reliability is diminishing with climate change.
  • Total disregard for 3 decades of planning for flood/fire prevention and habitat preservation — conflicts with the Urban Services Boundary (County’s ultimate boundary for growth) and the Natomas Basin Conservancy  
  • Millions of square feet of new commercial space will pull business from existing businesses in Natomas and downtown.
  • Increased congestion creates dangerous evacuation conditions in case of flooding or other emergencies.
  • Excessive and unhealthy air quality emissions are not sufficiently addressed. The EIR identifies significant air quality impacts that can’t be mitigated: there are conflicts with the air quality plan during project operation, emissions of key air pollutants and precursors during project operation, and exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminants during project operation. It also did not assess the ultrafine particulate emission health impacts of the project.
  • This project does not address the region’s affordable housing need and includes very few affordable housing units. Our housing need is for low and moderate income housing which also is a minor part of this project.  More importantly, plenty of land is already zoned for housing.  The housing crisis is now – construction on this project will not begin for many years and our housing needs will be completely different then.

Join Us!

• April 26 – Come to Sacramento Earth Day at Southside Park, 11- 4. Come by to say hi and talk about protecting open space in the Sacramento Region.
• April 28 – Come to the Board of Supervisors meeting and possible vote on Upper Westside. Voice your opposition. 2 pm at 700 H St, Sacramento.

Upper Westside Vote Scheduled for April 28

April 13, 2026

IMPORTANT UPDATE

The Board of Supervisors has tentatively scheduled a vote on the Upper Westside Project for Tuesday, April 28 at 2 pm.

They will meet in Board Chambers at 700 H Street Sacramento. The vote will be on the EIR and the Project. We will send another email confirming the meeting when the Board agenda is published on about April 24, 2026.

Take Action

  1. Send a Comment to BoardClerk[at]saccounty[dot]gov
  2. Attend the meeting. You can make a two minute verbal comment.
    For written or verbal comment ideas, see Comment Ideas, below
  3. Sign our Upper Westside Petition
  4. Contribute. Your donation helps us oppose this project
  5. Share this information and ask others to join our mailing list.

Background

The County Board of Supervisors has scheduled the vote to approve or deny this project which will rezone over 2,000 acres of farmland to enable residential and commercial development, thus destroying the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan.

The fundamental reason to oppose this project is that the County should not build an unincorporated city, the size of Galt, on land next to the Sacramento River. It will destroy valuable farmland and wildlife habitat, and, without improving main transportation arteries, increase traffic and congestion by adding over 20,000 people to Natomas. This project also flouts long-standing agreements between the City and the County. The City and the Natomas Basin Conservancy have retained counsel and sent strongly worded letters to the County explaining how proposed rezoning will destroy the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan. You should help us to oppose this project.

Comment Ideas

Email a comment to BoardClerk[at]saccounty[dot]gov. Include “Upper Westside Specific Plan” in the subject. Providing your contact information is optional. Or, you can mail a comment to the County Board of Supervisors at 700 H Street, Suite 2450, Sacramento, CA 95814

Points for your comments could include the following. You don’t need to use them all – which ones are the reasons for your opposition?

  • The City’s opposition – The City Council passed a resolution against UWSP. The City’s excellent letter is here.
  • There will be irreversible and fatal impacts to the Natomas Basin Conservancy, the Swainson’s Hawk and the Swainson’s Hawk Zone. Two excellent letters from NBC are here.
  • Traffic impacts to I-5 and I-80, West El Camino, and Garden Highway.
  • There is no viable source of water. The urban water rights do not exist for these parcels and water reliability is diminishing with climate change.
  • Total disregard for 3 decades of planning for flood/fire prevention and habitat preservation — conflicts with the Urban Services Boundary (County’s ultimate boundary for growth) and the Natomas Basin Conservancy
  • Millions of square feet of new commercial space will pull business from existing businesses in Natomas and downtown.
  • Increased congestion creates dangerous evacuation conditions in case of flooding or other emergencies.
  • Excessive and unhealthy air quality emissions are not sufficiently addressed. The EIR identifies significant air quality impacts that can’t be mitigated: there are conflicts with the air quality plan during project operation, emissions of key air pollutants and precursors during project operation, and exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminants during project operation. It also did not assess the ultrafine particulate emission health impacts of the project.
  • This project does not address the region’s affordable housing need and includes very few affordable housing units. Our housing need is for low and moderate income housing which also is a minor part of this project. More importantly, plenty of land is already zoned for housing. The housing crisis is now – construction on this project will not begin for many years and our housing needs will be completely different then.

Join Us!

• April 26, 2026 – Come to Sacramento Earth Day at Southside Park, 11- 4. Come by to say hi and talk about protecting open space in the Sacramento Region.
• April 28, 2026 – Come to the Board of Supervisors meeting and possible vote on Upper Westside. Voice your opposition. 2 pm at 700 H St, Sacramento. We will send another email to confirm that the vote will occur on April 28.

Natomas Projects and Supervisor Primary

Upper Westside Board of Supervisors FINAL VOTE

We have been told by county staff that the final vote for the Upper Westside Specific Plan (UWSP) and its flawed Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will take place at the end of April, probably April 28 or 29, 2026.

  • Please hold those dates and prepare to voice your opposition. We will email when the agenda item and time are confirmed. Be prepared to send an email comment to BoardClerk[at]saccounty[dot]gov. Include “Upper Westside Specific Plan” in the subject. Providing your contact information is optional. Or, you can mail a comment to the County Board of Supervisors at 700 H Street, Suite 2450, Sacramento, CA 95814

Talking points could include

  • The City’s opposition – The City Council passed a resolution against UWSP. The City’s excellent letter is here.
  • Fatal impacts to the Natomas Basin Conservancy, the Swainson’s Hawk and the Swainson’s Hawk Zone. Two excellent letters from NBC are here.
  • Traffic impacts to I-5 and I-80, West El Camino, and Garden Highway.
  • No viable source of water and loss of farmland and habitat.
  • Total disregard for 3 decades of planning for flood/fire prevention and habitat preservation — conflicts with the Urban Services Boundary (County’s ultimate boundary for growth) and the Natomas Basin Conservancy  
  • Millions of square feet of new commercial space will pull business from existing businesses in Natomas.
  • Increased congestion creates dangerous evacuation conditions in case of flooding or other emergencies.
  • The EIR identifies significant air quality impacts that can’t be mitigated: conflicts with the air quality plan during project operation, emissions of key air pollutants and precursors during project operation, and exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminants during project operation. It also did not assess the ultrafine particulate emission health impacts of the project.

Provenance AKA Grand Park at Natomas CPAC

ECOS and nearby neighbors testified at the March 11 meeting of the Natomas Community Planning Advisory Council (CPAC).

Unfortunately only one member of the CPAC attended. The developers gave a presentation of a nice planned community that is in the wrong location. They never mentioned habitat or the Natomas Basin Conservancy, and misrepresented the prior plans for the area.

We have asked the County staff to host meetings IN Natomas so more neighbors can attend. We will let you know when they are scheduled.

ASIP Annexation Approved

On March 4, LAFCO approved the annexation of the Airport South Industrial Project. ECOS has filed suits against both the City and LAFCo over their faulty environmental review. In the meantime, meetings will hopefully be arranged to allow neighbors and developers to discuss design issues and additional mitigation. The North Natomas Community Coalition is taking the lead in setting up these meetings.

Board of Supervisors Elections – Primary June 2, 2026

Districts 1, 2 and 5 will hold primaries. Natomas is in District 1. Learn about the District 1 Candidates: Tim Riley, Eric Guerra, Flo Cofer, and Deborah Ortiz.

  1. Sacramento League of Women Voters Candidate Forum for Sacramento County Supervisor, District 1 – Coloma Community Center 4623 T Street Sacramento, CA. Thursday, April 9 – Doors Open 5:30 Forum is 6 pm – 7:30 PM
  2. Link to video interviews of the four candidates for District 1, by Kent Lacin. The interviews focus on environmental issues.
  3. Not sure of your district? Enter zip code or see a map to find your district and supervisor.

For Your Calendar

April 9 – Attend the League of Women Voters Candidate Forum.
April 26 – Join us at Sacramento Earth Day.
April 28 or 29 – Possible vote on Upper Westside. We will share more information as soon as we have it.

Natomas Grandpark Begins! Send ASIP Comments

Two Things:

  1. Reminder about the March 4 meeting by LAFCo on the Airport South Industrial Project. Send comments.
  2. Information about the Grandpark Southwest project – workshop on March 11. Learn about this enormous project outside the USB.

Airport South Industrial Project

On March 4, 2026, Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) will vote on whether or not to permit annexation of 475 acres of farmland into the City of Sacramento for the Airport South Industrial Project (ASIP).

  1. Voice Your Opposition – Send an email comment to  BoardClerk[at]saccounty[dot]gov . Include meeting date (March 4, 2026) and agenda item number  (8)  and “Airport South Industrial”. Contact information is optional. Or, you can mail a letter to LAFCo at 1112 I Street, Suite 100, Sacramento, CA. 95814
  2. Meeting Agenda – Click on Item 8 to display the supporting documents and staff reports.
  3. Learn more about this project on ECOS’s website for protecting open space in Natomas.  The right column has Project Updates, News Articles, ECOS Letters submitted in opposition, and Letters from other organizations.

Grandpark Southwest Project aka “Provenance”

Grandpark Southwest has been renamed Provenance and will be the subject of an upcoming Workshop at the Natomas Community Planning Advisory Council.

Meeting info:  Wednesday, March 11, 6 pm, Board Chambers located at 700 H St, Sacramento, CA 95814. 

Come to this meeting to hear the developers – there is no vote and the agenda has not yet been published it.  Look for it here on about March 6.

What is proposed for “Provenance” ?

  • 1,871 acres which are currently mostly agricultural land will become 8,589 residential units
  • The land is outside the Urban Service Boundary – a county project
  • Land use map
  • Project description
  • The Sacramento Business Journal published an article about the project on February 26, 2026

Thank you for your continuing support to oppose rampant developer-driven destruction of protected agricultural land and habitat.

Airport South Industrial – LAFCO Vote, March 4

On March 4, 2026, the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) will vote on whether or not to permit annexation of 475 acres of farmland into the City of Sacramento for the Airport South Industrial Project (ASIP).

A little history – in April of 2025, LAFCO voted to approve the City’s Sphere of Influence application and Environmental Impact Report for ASIP – IE they have already voted yes on this project. On December 2, 2025, the City Council voted to approve the project and annexation.

We believe a “yes” vote would be a mistake, especially considering that one of LAFCO’s primary responsibilities is to protect farmland. We believe it is enough of a mistake that ECOS, Friends of the Swainson’s Hawk and Sierra Club have filed lawsuits against both the City of Sacramento and LAFCO to void these decisions.

What You Can Do

  • Voice your opposition – Send an email comment to BoardClerk[at]saccounty[dot]gov . Include meeting date (March 4, 2026) and agenda item number if published (otherwise state “Airport South Industrial”). Contact information is optional. Or, you can mail a letter to LAFCo at 1112 I Street, Suite 100, Sacramento, CA 95814
  • Donate to support the opposition – we are shoe-string non-profits and this litigation is costing us in excess of $80,000. Your donations are critical. Donate here. Thank you.

Meeting Information

The Public Notice has been published, the Agenda will be available here. The meeting is at 5:30 pm, 700 H St, Board Chambers, Sacramento. Anyone can attend the meeting or submit comments.

Project Perspective

We at ECOS are deeply disappointed at the City and LAFCO support for the project. The EIR clearly shows that impacts on air quality and agriculture are regional in scope and cannot be mitigated. The City requested and the developer agreed to some small changes to the ASIP plan, which may make the project marginally better for human neighbors, including an increased setback. For plants and wildlife, the project is destructive in a fragile protected remnant of important habitat. Because the EIR was not a valid assessment of the habitat impacts, we can only point to specific obvious examples: the elimination of wetlands without mitigation, the loss of two adjacent Swainson’s Hawk nesting sites, the loss of habitat values in adjacent parcels to the south and to the adjacent canals, home to the endangered Giant Garter Snake.

Update on Other Threats

Protecting open space in the Natomas Basin will be challenge going forward. In addition to ASIP, another 7000+ acres are under threat of development. These range from rice fields north of Elkhorn Blvd (Grandpark Southwest and Grandpark Trails) to the “Boot” area along Garden Hwy (Upper Westside Project). Stopping ASIP can help slow down this threat.

The Upper Westside developer is working to complete the Environmental Impact Report and has recently made modifications to it. Several organizations submitted outstanding letters of opposition to the changes. The Natomas Basin Conservancy wrote a powerful letter challenging the proposed water source for the project.

To learn more about these projects and our opposition, visit ECOS’s Natomas Campaign webpage to Protect Our Open Space.

Thank you for your support and participation.