Upper Westside – Help Us Oppose!

Vote is Confirmed!

The Board of Supervisors has scheduled their vote on the Upper Westside Project for Tuesday, April 28 at 2 pm.  The agenda and the staff report are here, they were published April 22, 2026 well after 6 pm.

The Supervisors will meet in Board Chambers at 700 H Street, Sacramento.  The vote will be on the EIR and the Project. 

Take Action

  1. Send a Comment to BoardClerk[at]saccounty[dot]gov
    The vote is Agenda item # 66 “The Upper Westside Specific Plan”.  Put this information at the top of your comment.
  2. Attend the meeting.  You can make a two minute verbal comment. For written or verbal comment ideas, see Comment Ideas, below
  3. Sign our Upper Westside Petition
  4. Contribute. Your donation helps us oppose this project
  5. Share this information and ask others to join our mailing list.
  6. Share this Video of people who live on Garden Hwy speaking out against the project.
  7. We will be at Sacramento Earth Day at Southside Park on Sunday April 26 from 11-4.  Stop by our booth #R2, and say hi!

Background

The County Board of Supervisors has scheduled the vote to approve or deny this project which will rezone over 2,000 acres of farmland to enable residential and commercial development, thus destroying the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan.

The fundamental reason to oppose this project is that the County should not build an unincorporated city, the size of Galt, on land next to the Sacramento River. It will destroy valuable farmland and wildlife habitat, and, without improving main transportation arteries, increase traffic and congestion by adding over 20,000 people to Natomas. This project also flouts long-standing agreements between the City and the County. The City and the Natomas Basin Conservancy have retained counsel and sent strongly worded letters to the County explaining how proposed rezoning will destroy the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan. You should help us to oppose this project.

Comment Ideas

Email a comment to BoardClerk[at]saccounty[dot]gov. Include “Upper Westside Specific Plan” in the subject. Providing your contact information is optional. Or, you can mail a comment to the County Board of Supervisors at 700 H Street, Suite 2450, Sacramento, CA 95814

Points for your comments could include the following. You don’t need to use them all – use ones that reflect your reasons for opposition.

  • The City’s opposition – The City Council passed a resolution against UWSP.  The City’s excellent letter is here.
  • There will be irreversible and fatal impacts to the Natomas Basin Conservancy, the Swainson’s Hawk and the Swainson’s Hawk Zone.  Two excellent letters from NBC are here.
  • Traffic impacts to I-5 and I-80, West El Camino, and Garden Highway.
  • There is no viable source of water. The urban water rights do not exist for these parcels and water reliability is diminishing with climate change.
  • Total disregard for 3 decades of planning for flood/fire prevention and habitat preservation — conflicts with the Urban Services Boundary (County’s ultimate boundary for growth) and the Natomas Basin Conservancy  
  • Millions of square feet of new commercial space will pull business from existing businesses in Natomas and downtown.
  • Increased congestion creates dangerous evacuation conditions in case of flooding or other emergencies.
  • Excessive and unhealthy air quality emissions are not sufficiently addressed. The EIR identifies significant air quality impacts that can’t be mitigated: there are conflicts with the air quality plan during project operation, emissions of key air pollutants and precursors during project operation, and exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminants during project operation. It also did not assess the ultrafine particulate emission health impacts of the project.
  • This project does not address the region’s affordable housing need and includes very few affordable housing units. Our housing need is for low and moderate income housing which also is a minor part of this project.  More importantly, plenty of land is already zoned for housing.  The housing crisis is now – construction on this project will not begin for many years and our housing needs will be completely different then.

Join Us!

• April 26 – Come to Sacramento Earth Day at Southside Park, 11- 4. Come by to say hi and talk about protecting open space in the Sacramento Region.
• April 28 – Come to the Board of Supervisors meeting and possible vote on Upper Westside. Voice your opposition. 2 pm at 700 H St, Sacramento.

Upper Westside Vote Scheduled for April 28

April 13, 2026

IMPORTANT UPDATE

The Board of Supervisors has tentatively scheduled a vote on the Upper Westside Project for Tuesday, April 28 at 2 pm.

They will meet in Board Chambers at 700 H Street Sacramento. The vote will be on the EIR and the Project. We will send another email confirming the meeting when the Board agenda is published on about April 24, 2026.

Take Action

  1. Send a Comment to BoardClerk[at]saccounty[dot]gov
  2. Attend the meeting. You can make a two minute verbal comment.
    For written or verbal comment ideas, see Comment Ideas, below
  3. Sign our Upper Westside Petition
  4. Contribute. Your donation helps us oppose this project
  5. Share this information and ask others to join our mailing list.

Background

The County Board of Supervisors has scheduled the vote to approve or deny this project which will rezone over 2,000 acres of farmland to enable residential and commercial development, thus destroying the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan.

The fundamental reason to oppose this project is that the County should not build an unincorporated city, the size of Galt, on land next to the Sacramento River. It will destroy valuable farmland and wildlife habitat, and, without improving main transportation arteries, increase traffic and congestion by adding over 20,000 people to Natomas. This project also flouts long-standing agreements between the City and the County. The City and the Natomas Basin Conservancy have retained counsel and sent strongly worded letters to the County explaining how proposed rezoning will destroy the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan. You should help us to oppose this project.

Comment Ideas

Email a comment to BoardClerk[at]saccounty[dot]gov. Include “Upper Westside Specific Plan” in the subject. Providing your contact information is optional. Or, you can mail a comment to the County Board of Supervisors at 700 H Street, Suite 2450, Sacramento, CA 95814

Points for your comments could include the following. You don’t need to use them all – which ones are the reasons for your opposition?

  • The City’s opposition – The City Council passed a resolution against UWSP. The City’s excellent letter is here.
  • There will be irreversible and fatal impacts to the Natomas Basin Conservancy, the Swainson’s Hawk and the Swainson’s Hawk Zone. Two excellent letters from NBC are here.
  • Traffic impacts to I-5 and I-80, West El Camino, and Garden Highway.
  • There is no viable source of water. The urban water rights do not exist for these parcels and water reliability is diminishing with climate change.
  • Total disregard for 3 decades of planning for flood/fire prevention and habitat preservation — conflicts with the Urban Services Boundary (County’s ultimate boundary for growth) and the Natomas Basin Conservancy
  • Millions of square feet of new commercial space will pull business from existing businesses in Natomas and downtown.
  • Increased congestion creates dangerous evacuation conditions in case of flooding or other emergencies.
  • Excessive and unhealthy air quality emissions are not sufficiently addressed. The EIR identifies significant air quality impacts that can’t be mitigated: there are conflicts with the air quality plan during project operation, emissions of key air pollutants and precursors during project operation, and exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminants during project operation. It also did not assess the ultrafine particulate emission health impacts of the project.
  • This project does not address the region’s affordable housing need and includes very few affordable housing units. Our housing need is for low and moderate income housing which also is a minor part of this project. More importantly, plenty of land is already zoned for housing. The housing crisis is now – construction on this project will not begin for many years and our housing needs will be completely different then.

Join Us!

• April 26, 2026 – Come to Sacramento Earth Day at Southside Park, 11- 4. Come by to say hi and talk about protecting open space in the Sacramento Region.
• April 28, 2026 – Come to the Board of Supervisors meeting and possible vote on Upper Westside. Voice your opposition. 2 pm at 700 H St, Sacramento. We will send another email to confirm that the vote will occur on April 28.

Natomas Projects and Supervisor Primary

Upper Westside Board of Supervisors FINAL VOTE

We have been told by county staff that the final vote for the Upper Westside Specific Plan (UWSP) and its flawed Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will take place at the end of April, probably April 28 or 29, 2026.

  • Please hold those dates and prepare to voice your opposition. We will email when the agenda item and time are confirmed. Be prepared to send an email comment to BoardClerk[at]saccounty[dot]gov. Include “Upper Westside Specific Plan” in the subject. Providing your contact information is optional. Or, you can mail a comment to the County Board of Supervisors at 700 H Street, Suite 2450, Sacramento, CA 95814

Talking points could include

  • The City’s opposition – The City Council passed a resolution against UWSP. The City’s excellent letter is here.
  • Fatal impacts to the Natomas Basin Conservancy, the Swainson’s Hawk and the Swainson’s Hawk Zone. Two excellent letters from NBC are here.
  • Traffic impacts to I-5 and I-80, West El Camino, and Garden Highway.
  • No viable source of water and loss of farmland and habitat.
  • Total disregard for 3 decades of planning for flood/fire prevention and habitat preservation — conflicts with the Urban Services Boundary (County’s ultimate boundary for growth) and the Natomas Basin Conservancy  
  • Millions of square feet of new commercial space will pull business from existing businesses in Natomas.
  • Increased congestion creates dangerous evacuation conditions in case of flooding or other emergencies.
  • The EIR identifies significant air quality impacts that can’t be mitigated: conflicts with the air quality plan during project operation, emissions of key air pollutants and precursors during project operation, and exposure of sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminants during project operation. It also did not assess the ultrafine particulate emission health impacts of the project.

Provenance AKA Grand Park at Natomas CPAC

ECOS and nearby neighbors testified at the March 11 meeting of the Natomas Community Planning Advisory Council (CPAC).

Unfortunately only one member of the CPAC attended. The developers gave a presentation of a nice planned community that is in the wrong location. They never mentioned habitat or the Natomas Basin Conservancy, and misrepresented the prior plans for the area.

We have asked the County staff to host meetings IN Natomas so more neighbors can attend. We will let you know when they are scheduled.

ASIP Annexation Approved

On March 4, LAFCO approved the annexation of the Airport South Industrial Project. ECOS has filed suits against both the City and LAFCo over their faulty environmental review. In the meantime, meetings will hopefully be arranged to allow neighbors and developers to discuss design issues and additional mitigation. The North Natomas Community Coalition is taking the lead in setting up these meetings.

Board of Supervisors Elections – Primary June 2, 2026

Districts 1, 2 and 5 will hold primaries. Natomas is in District 1. Learn about the District 1 Candidates: Tim Riley, Eric Guerra, Flo Cofer, and Deborah Ortiz.

  1. Sacramento League of Women Voters Candidate Forum for Sacramento County Supervisor, District 1 – Coloma Community Center 4623 T Street Sacramento, CA. Thursday, April 9 – Doors Open 5:30 Forum is 6 pm – 7:30 PM
  2. Link to video interviews of the four candidates for District 1, by Kent Lacin. The interviews focus on environmental issues.
  3. Not sure of your district? Enter zip code or see a map to find your district and supervisor.

For Your Calendar

April 9 – Attend the League of Women Voters Candidate Forum.
April 26 – Join us at Sacramento Earth Day.
April 28 or 29 – Possible vote on Upper Westside. We will share more information as soon as we have it.

Interviews of Candidates for Sacramento County Supervisor for District 1

Get familiar with the candidates and ready to vote in the primary on Jun 2, 2026. Watch the videos of interviews with these four candidates:
• Flojaune Cofer
• Eric Guerra
• Deborah Ortiz
• Tim Riley

Kent Lacin of Sacramento conducted the interviews and made the videos.

Introduction by Kent Lacin:

Overview:
I thank the candidates for agreeing to do the interview. Running for office is a big undertaking, and they deserve our gratitude for taking the plunge!

These interviews are longer than the sound bites we get in the media world. I hope they will help you get to know the candidates and arouse your interest in our County Board of Supervisors. It has only five officials, and they have great power to shape our region.

My Message:
The environment is more than our rivers and trees, or our buildings and roads. It is our ideas and the people who represent them: our politicians. WE give them the power to take ideas and turn them into reality. Therefore, we need to learn what their ideas are. Because we care about the environment, choosing the right candidate is critical.

Sacramento County District 1 is large, covering 112 square miles – it includes most of the City of Sacramento, reaching south to Florin Road. It has been represented by Phil Serna since 2010. Whomever is elected will have great influence on the future growth of our county. Many new large housing developments are proposed for agricultural land in District 1, so key topics include reducing greenhouse gas emissions from traffic and buildings, protecting green spaces, and managing water. The interviews focus on these and other environmental issues.

Acknowledgements:
The interviews were jointly sponsored by 350 Sacramento, Environmental Council of Sacramento (ECOS), and Sacramento Citizen’s Climate Lobby. Much thanks to Barbara and Channel Creative, who allowed me to film in their studio with their lights. These generous people help make Sacramento the community I’m happy to be a part of. Thanks also to ECOS for handling the technical issues in posting the interviews on YouTube.

Deborah Ortiz Interview

Eric Guerra Interview

Flojaune Cofer Interview

Tim Riley Interview

Presentation slides by architect David Mogavero from Feb 12, 2026 presentation

David Mogavero, Architect — If you missed it, see the presentation slides by architect David Mogavero on Feb 12, 2026.

ECOS Climate Change Committee thanks David for his engaging presentation of his architectural work; his activities as president of the ECOS Board including involvement in regional planning and the lawsuit of SACOG that led to the first Blueprint; his concept for VMT as a standard that led to SB743, and his designs for multi-unit residential buildings in infill locations in Sacramento and across California. See this and more in his presentation here.

North Natomas industrial project clears final regulatory hurdle, March 5, 2026, The Sacramento Bee

By Chaewon Chung | March 5, 2026 | The Sacramento Bee

The Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission voted in favor of the Airport South Industrial Project in North Natomas on Wednesday, marking the final stage in the regulatory process for the proposal to move forward.

“This project is in the wrong location, it will worsen our air pollution problem, threatening the health of school children and nearby residents when there is already plenty of land within the city that is zoned as industrial and listed as vacant,” Fargo said on Thursday.

Click here to read the article in full.