Sacramento supervisors to vote on project that could add 25,000 people to Natomas, June 15, 2026, The Sacramento Bee

By Jennah Pendleton | June 15, 2026 | The Sacramento Bee

The Upper Westside Project is a proposed development in unincorporated Natomas which would include more than 9,300 housing units, 3.1 million square feet of commercial space and up to four new public schools. The project has faced considerable pushback from community members, environmental groups and local politicians — including both candidates running to represent the area next year.

Click here to read the article in full.

Upper Westside Vote – June 16, 2026

The Board of Supervisors (BOS) has scheduled a vote on the Upper Westside project for Tuesday, June 16 at 2 pm. Plan to attend at 700 H St, Sacramento.

To confirm that the vote will be held, the morning of the 16th, check our webpage or social media pages.

Places where you can get updates include:

You can also check the agenda on Board of Supervisors meeting webpage.

Background

The vote is to approve or deny this project which will rezone over 2,000 acres of farmland to enable residential and commercial development.

The fundamental reason to oppose this project is that the County should not build an unincorporated city, the size of Galt, in a flood zone, next to the Sacramento River. It will destroy valuable farmland and wildlife habitat. The project will add over 20,000 people to Natomas and will not improve main transportation arteries, resulting in increased traffic and congestion. This project also flouts long-standing agreements between the City and the County.

The City and the Natomas Basin Conservancy have retained counsel and sent strongly worded letters to the County explaining how proposed rezoning will destroy the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan. You should help us to oppose this project.

Submit a Comment to the Supervisors

Email a comment to BoardClerk[at]saccounty[dot]gov. Include “Upper Westside Specific Plan” Item #58, in the subject. Providing your contact information is optional. Or, you can mail a comment to the County Board of Supervisors at 700 H Street, Suite 2450, Sacramento, CA 95814

Ideas for your comments could include the following. You don’t need to use them all – use ones that reflect your reasons for opposition.

  • The City’s opposition – The City Council passed a resolution against UWSP. The City’s excellent letter is here
  • Habitat – There will be irreversible and fatal impacts to the Natomas Basin Conservancy, the Swainson’s Hawk and the Swainson’s Hawk Zone. Two excellent letters from NBC are here. There is total disregard for 3 decades of planning for habitat preservation. There are conflicts with the Urban Services Boundary (County’s ultimate boundary for growth) and the Natomas Basin Conservancy.  
  • Traffic impacts – I-5 and I-80, West El Camino, and Garden Highway will be severely impacted by the addition of 20,000 residents.
  • Water – There is no viable source of water. The urban water rights do not exist for these parcels and water reliability is diminishing with climate change. ECOS wrote a letter in response to the project’s recent proposal to use agricultural water.
  • Fire & Police – Concern with the ability of the county to provide adequate protection for urban scale services typically handled by the city, not the county.
  • Negative business impact – Millions of square feet of new commercial space will pull business from existing businesses in Natomas and downtown.
  • Evacuation Risk – Increased congestion creates dangerous evacuation conditions in case of flooding or other emergencies.
  • Air Quality Damage – Excessive and unhealthy air quality emissions are not sufficiently addressed. The EIR identifies significant air quality impacts that can’t be mitigated.
  • Lack of Affordable Housing – This project does not address the region’s affordable housing need. Our housing need is for low and moderate income housing which is a minor part of this project. More importantly, plenty of land is already zoned for housing. See ECOS’ letter that argues against more SacCounty approvals of Greenfield projects including the Upper Westside proposal.

Please join us in opposing this project.  Attend the meeting, give a 2 minute spoken comment and/or, submit a written comment.

Thank you for taking action to demonstrate your opposition to this project.

Upper Westside County Vote, June 2026, N Magazine

Upper Westside – County Vote June 16

Can you even imagine approving a town the size of Galt in just one meeting?? With little to no public input? Well, that’s what the County Board of Supervisors is poised to do, on June 16, 2026.

The Board has not held a public hearing to address community concerns since 2020. Long, contentious public meetings were held before the Natomas Community Planning Advisory Council and the Planning Commission. The public has plenty to say but the supervisors don’t appear to want to hear it.

To get a feel for the project, go to the intersection of El Centro and W. El Camino and look west to the Garden Highway. All of it, 2000 acres of prime farmland, would be replaced with over 9000 homes and 3 million square feet of commercial uses – larger than the Roseville Galleria and as many people as Galt or El Cerrito.

The traffic congestion alone will be appalling and will lead to worsened air quality for all of us in the region.

Opposition includes the City of Sacramento, Sutter County, the Natomas Basin Conservancy, ECOS, and residents. Also opposed are developers who built Natomas, and who were required to finance the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan to mitigate for the loss of farmland and habitat. Over $140,000,000 has been invested to purchase and manage land for permanent habitat to save endangered and threatened species. If the Upper Westside Project is allowed to proceed, it will destroy the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan.

There is no real plan for water for the project. It would use agricultural water from the Natomas Central Mutual Water Company, which has water rights and approval to supply water for farmland. They would need multiple permissions to provide water for municipal use and to build a water treatment facility.

Finally, there is the myth that this project addresses Sacramento’s housing crisis. Records show that 140,000 housing units have been approved in Sacramento County but not yet built. Construction is the solution, not permission for more projects. We need to BUILD affordable housing, not approve another upscale project that adds to the glut of unbuilt units approved.

Please contact your county supervisors and tell them to say NO to this poorly conceived and destructive mega development. If you want to learn more about the effects of the development on our Natomas community, visit the ECOS webpage for Natomas.

Environmental Council of Sacramento
https://www.ecosacramento.net/what-we-do/committees/climate-change-committee/land-use-natomas-team/
County Board of Supervisors
www.bos.saccounty.gov/
Phone: 916.874.5411

Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1684528993233750&set=pcb.1684529963233653